In the above sections of the article, the importance of the concept of natural justice and the principles around which it revolves was roughly discussed. But like many other laws and legal principles, this rule is not absolute and contains certain limitations that have evolved over time. Natural justice applications have been repeatedly excluded, which would be discussed in more detail in the article. If the measure taken by the administrative authority is a suspension order within the meaning of a precautionary measure and not a final order, the application of the principles of natural justice may be excluded. In the event that the institution has issued an order prohibiting the student from entering the premises of the institution and attending classes until criminal proceedings are initiated against him for stabbing a classmate. These principles of natural justice are excluded from the exceptions of [i] PaathShala, L. (2020, 12). Principles of Natural Justice. Retrieved on 05, 2021, by If a person has no right and cannot derive a right from a statute or common law provision, he or she cannot seek relief in accordance with the principles of natural justice in that case, and he or she may lose procedural fairness in that case. The Latin principle Ebi Jus ebiremedium means where there is a right, there is a remedy.

Therefore, in cases where there is no right, no remedy can of course be granted. The Supreme Court annulled the decision of the Tax Court if the taxpayer was not informed by the competent department of the payment of the taxes due. It may be noted that in a country like India, surveillance can be a very serious restriction on the liberty of individuals, so the keeping of the surveillance register cannot be so completely administrative and extrajudicial that it is difficult to imagine the application of the rules of natural justice. This was a landmark decision in which the Regional Passport Officer in New Delhi asked the complainant to surrender her passport. When asked about the reason for this order, reasons of « public interest » were invoked. The complainant applied to the Supreme Court and stated that the authorities` order had violated the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 14, 19 (a), 19 (g) and 21. They also argued that this order of the passport authorities had also breached the principles of natural justice by not giving the applicant a reasonable opportunity to be heard in order to defend her (violation of the Audi alteram partem). Respondents stated that Article 21 does not have to pass the « adequacy test » and that the framers of the constitution became aware of this. They added that the principles of natural justice are not mentioned anywhere in the Indian constitution and are very vague. The concept of natural justice is regularly regarded as a global idea, it has been largely replaced and realized by the general duty to act rationally.

Natural justice is an artificial term that refers to explicit procedural rights in the English legal system and the framework conditions of the various countries that depend on it. It is like the American ideas of a rational system and fair treatment, the latter meaning that a certain degree of equality is the starting point for natural justice. Relevance: Natural justice is the fundamental rule of procedural fairness. The entire constitution is based on the principles of natural justice. It is not a codified law, but it depends on the substance of the case. This implies that everyone, regardless of religion, caste and gender, has the right to a fair trial. It is based on the principle that the law should not only be fair, but also appear to be fair. The breach of the principles of natural justice also constitutes a violation of sections 14 and 21. It can be seen without much effort that the principles of natural justice include the idea of fairness: they remain alive and behind in protecting fair practices. Therefore, while authority shines at all stages of the system, legal capacity is not absolutely recognized, but the main reason is to prevent miscarriage of justice. It should be noted as a matter of priority that any election or motion that does not take into account natural justice will be declared invalid and void, and the main concern should then be that the principles of natural justice are fundamental to the consideration of any authoritative regulation as substantial. The guideline of natural justice is not limited by walls, its applicability depends on the characteristics of the jurisdiction granted to the administration and the notion of rights influenced by the person.

[8] Natural justice can be applied precisely when it is viable to apply it in nature. In any event, natural justice can be avoided if there is no common sense for the circumstances that compose it.

Devenez membre de Copywriting Pratique !

Si vous souhaitez :

  • Recevoir chaque nouvel article du blog directement dans votre boîte mail (si vous le souhaitez),
  • Avoir accès à des générateurs en ligne inédits (générateur de slogans, de noms de marques, d'accroches, un dico des synonymes avec une mise en situation, un formateur d'emails et même le fameux calculateur du Sympathomètre d'un texte),
  • Un guide qui vous explique comment trouver plus de 354 millions d’images gratuites et libres de droits...

Pour vous inscrire et avoir accès à tout ça, c'est facile : Indiquez votre prénom et votre email dans le formulaire ci-dessous :